A leadership style refers to the characteristic behaviors of a leader in leading, motivating, guiding, and managing groups of people. Great leaders can inspire political movements and social change. They can also motivate others to act, create and innovate. Thus, a manager's behavior and situational demands give rise to various leadership styles as discussed above.
Good and very rich material on this website. Very informative, I have learned a lot. Can you tell me the author of this definition? I need it for my master's thesis ???? Thank you in advance. Leadership style is the way and approach to provide direction, implement plans and motivate people.
As employees see it, it includes the total pattern of explicit and implicit actions taken by its leader (Newstrom, Davis, 1999.Authoritarian leadership styles allow a leader to set expectations and define outcomes. A one-man show can be successful in situations where a leader is the most knowledgeable of the team. Although this is an effective strategy in limited periods of time, creativity will be sacrificed as the team's input is limited. Authoritarian leadership style is also used when team members need clear guidelines.
Participatory leadership styles are based on democratic theory. The essence is to involve team members in the decision-making process. Thus, team members feel included, engaged and motivated to contribute. The leader will normally have the final say in decision-making processes.
However, if there are disagreements within a group, it can take a long time to reach a consensus. Also known as laissez-faire leadership, a style of delegative leadership focuses on delegating initiative to team members. This can be a successful strategy if team members are competent, take responsibility and prefer to participate in individual work. However, disagreements between members can divide and divide a group, leading to a lack of motivation and low morale.
Leadership is an influential relationship between leaders and followers who seek real change and reflect their mutual purpose. According to Wikipedia, “Strategic leadership is the ability to influence others to make voluntary decisions that improve the organization's long-term prospects of success. Transactional leadership presents a form of strategic leadership that is important for the development of the organization. There is evidence that leaders who are considered in their leadership style perform better and are more satisfied with their work (Schriesheim, 198).
However, the charismatic leadership style is considered less favorable, since success or failure depends largely on the leader and his impact. This was first described by Lewin, Lippitt and White in 1939, along with autocratic and democratic leadership styles. An authoritarian leadership style can create a climate of fear, leaving little or no room for dialogue, and where subordinates may consider complaints useless. In any workplace scenario, the democratic leadership style is the most preferred over other leadership styles.
I haven't found a more concise article that addresses the whole issue of leadership styles like this. The study found that there is a relationship between emotions, work behavior and transactional leadership that affects the team. While a certain leadership style may have an impact on a specific job, for example, autocratic leaders do well in military settings, the best leadership is to use a combination of these styles. While democratic leadership is one of the most effective leadership styles, it has some potential disadvantages.
When authoritarian leadership is diverted to areas where it is not needed, it can create dysfunctional environments where followers are the “good” and dominant leaders are the “bad”. We've already talked about how personality traits, behaviors, and situations (and the response to those situations) affect leadership. .